21 Carat E-Mail

Posted by arvind s grover Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:22:00 GMT

I have been encouraging my mother to check her e-mail more often, but it has not been easy to get her to be a regular. Since she has been in India, she has been checking her e-mail much more often. Her sister has e-mail in the house (as does my mother), which makes communication very easy. In the U.S., phones are so convenient and inexpensive, that they are a natural communication tool. Also, no one is more than a few hours off of your time zone. When in India though, people in the U.S. are 10.5 hours behind, so phoning is often a problem, not to mention it is expensive, and often there is a poor connection. So, e-mail becomes a natural choice. My mother has been e- mailing with my father and others in the U.S. and is quickly becoming more comfortable than she was with multiple computers back home in the U.S.

This evening she was replying to an e-mail my father sent, and pulled me over to ask me a question, “Why do dad’s e-mails always have those nice little things on them?”

“Nice little things,” I wondered? She was talking about carats— > (the greater than symbol). So I explained that the some computer programs put carats to show the original message, and then you write your reply above that area. She was shocked and went on to explain that she has been manually typing them at the start of each line because she thinks they look pretty! My brother and I couldn’t help but laugh. Something which we found so functional was something that was aesthetic to her. This little symbol had never really explained itself.

How does one learn what the conventions of e-mail are without really being explained them. One would have to discover when they appeared and when they didn’t. You might think you would discover it without being told, but think about it: the carats never appear when you type a message. So as far as a new user is concerned, carats are not part of your e-mail system. You do sometimes see them on other peoples’ e-mail (when you reply or forward them, or if you are forwarded something), but you can never cause them to appear. Only once you understand the logic can you necessarily see its usage.

This problem makes me think of how young people communicate with my electronically. Often when students e-mail me it looks like this,
“heyz mr g, whas our hw for tonite, i didnt write it down in class and i don wanna get no points off for being late, k? email me back as sooon as u get this. thx!!!!”

While this is a perfectly valid way of communicating with a 13-year old peer, we must make sure students are able to communicate appropriately online. You often see the same type of thing on electronic bulletin boards used for class discussions. My rules for those are to direct students to more formal writing, rather than social writing. There is a place for each, and we must help students understand those lines. How are people teaching appropriate voice online?

no comments | no trackbacks

Is The World Flat?

Posted by arvind s grover Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:19:00 GMT

A couple of the e-lists I am on (“ISED-L”, “NYCIST”) have been discussing Thomas Friedman’s World Is Flat and its implications for education. I am currently in New Delhi, India for a vacation, and have been overwhelmed with all the evidence supporting the flat-world theory. The last time I was here was 5 years ago. There has been much progress.

To deal with extreme pollution, all public buses (and there are a lot) are run on natural gas now. McDonalds, Subways, Dominos are all over. Middle-class values are spreading like wildfire, and consumerism is everywhere. Cell phones ringtones are the background noise of any city street. Car varieties have increased 5-fold. Government control is out, market freedom is in. One of the most interesting things I have seen are the advertisements. As India enters a period of freer-markets, you can see the market battles emerging. Cell phone plans were so convoluted that no one could figure out which plan was better. It was far more confusing than U.S. plans. But, you can see the evolution as the market is working itself out, and producing more consumer-friendly plans as the competition increases (I am not a free-market economist btw, but I still see much of this). Last time I was here, credit cards could only be used in a handful of places. Today, I can use my AMEX all over. Credit is huge in India now, and is quickly causing Indians to feel like they can spend money, whereas old timers were mainly concerned with saving it.

In the NYC subways, there are adds for Lufthansa everywhere—here there are nearly the same adds, but with an Indian touch. Global marketing only recently included India. It makes me think of Friedman’s support of outsourcing. Bringing American business to India has helped create a middle-class here which is driving a demand for American goods. And there are over a billion people here, huge huge new markets for American companies – Intel Pentium chips are everywhere, Coca-Cola and Pepsi signs are painted across this country from cities to country-sides. Yesterday I went by the Nike shop and passed Nine West too. The change in 5 years is just phenomenal. I can’t even imagine how much business is going to be had here for American companies.

Side note: my cousins go to school in an American school in Mumbai (Bombay). They have a tablet-laptop program beginning in 6th grade. The educational competition is as real as it gets, and probably a little understated in Friedman’s book. He sort of espouses the rote-knowleldge efforts of developing countries like China and India, but may be missing the real efforts here to create higher-order learning institutions. Once that goes into play, the hegemony of the U.S. may be hanging on its amazing infrastructure rather than its amazing intellectual superiority. Once these countries can repair their roads, communications and governance systems (and they have improved greatly in the last 5 years), it will be time for us to get nervous. We as educators must be thinking of ways to lead the pack rather than follow it.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in future | no comments | no trackbacks