<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>21apples comments on Learning Isn't Fun, Knowing Is Fun</title>
    <link>http://www.21apples.org/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>21apples comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"Learning Isn't Fun, Knowing Is Fun" by arvind</title>
      <description>From &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/06/01/09/2316229.shtml?tid=146&amp;#38;tid=185"&gt;Slashdot discussion on Edutainment&lt;/a&gt; software
&lt;blockquote&gt;As one of my wisest college professors said when students were grubmling about having to learn formal definitions for a mathematics class, &amp;#8220;I don&amp;#8217;t know where people get the idea that learning is supposed to be fun. Learning can be fun, but it can also be really tough&amp;#8212;even downright miserable. Knowing is fun.&amp;#8221;&amp;#8212;&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/~Copid"&gt;Copid&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

	&lt;p&gt;This was specifically in response to a &lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/interactive-learning-flops/2006/01/09/1136771500779.html"&gt;British study released&lt;/a&gt; which showed that students who &amp;#8220;read&amp;#8221; books on very animated CD-ROMS retained less than those who &amp;#8220;read&amp;#8221; the books on more text-driven CD-ROMS. The study to me came off as barely helpful because they were comparing the text-based CD-ROMS to those with content which was distracting and unrelated. Of course distracting and unrelated content will make students less likely to follow the material. Isn&amp;#8217;t that obvious?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I love the quote though. I think there can be confusion when teachers see students as &amp;#8220;engaged&amp;#8221; when they are simply using laptops or other technologies. Teachers must create situations in which students can relish solving problems or wrestle with higher-order topics while utilizing more mechanical methods. Let us be careful of the edutainment trap which ends up using a lot of bells and whistles to create curricularly-shallow (yes I know curricularly is not a word) lessons. It should never be about the technology, but what can be accomplished with the technology. Teachers and administrators should be focused on learning objectives, and not how much time/energy students are willing to spend on laptops.
&lt;!&amp;#8212;technorati tags start&amp;#8212;&gt;&lt;p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/education" rel="tag"&gt;education&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/teaching" rel="tag"&gt;teaching&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!&amp;#8212;technorati tags end&amp;#8212;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:18:00 EST</pubDate>
      <guid>&lt;a href="/articles/2006/01/10/learning-isnt-fun-knowing-is-fun"&gt;Learning Isn't Fun, Knowing Is Fun&lt;/a&gt;</guid>
      <link>&lt;a href="/articles/2006/01/10/learning-isnt-fun-knowing-is-fun"&gt;Learning Isn't Fun, Knowing Is Fun&lt;/a&gt;</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
